| |
| Ultimi commenti - "Balle Spaziali", ovvero...Space B.S.!!! |
Unknown_Lunar_Event.jpgUnknown Lunar Event?119 visiteDa "Fonte Ignota" mi é stato inviato questo frame che dovrebbe rappresentare un "mega-impatto" occorso a ridosso del Margine Nord della nostra Luna, qualche tempo fa.
Beh, commentare un "fenomeno" del genere mi é impossibile. Può essere qualsiasi cosa. Mi ricorda il cosiddetto "Evento della Torre" (che era genuino); ma questa immagine (mi si dice ottenuta da un Foto-Amatore) può rappresentare od essere davvero "qualsiasi cosa".
Anche un fake.
Nel dubbio - mi si perdoni - metto comunque il file a disposizione dei Lettori, per commenti e riflessioni. Ma lo inserisco nella Sezione dedicata alle "Balle Spaziali". E questa - anche se vorrei sbagliarmi - ci assomiglia molto...MareKromium07/30/23 at 16:01Paolo C. Fienga: Considera.
|
|
The_Tower-1.jpgA new "Monolith-like Structure" on Mars...119 visiteWith thousands of images taken by various probes sent to Mars, it would seem inevitable that unusual or puzzling objects might be seen in some of them. And of course, there have been, most notably the famous “Face on Mars” first seen in low-resolution Viking Orbiter images in the 1970s. Higher-resolution images taken later by other orbiters with better cameras showed it, and nearby interesting formations, to be just natural hills and mesas. Despite that, other curious things are seen in both orbital and ground images from time to time, although they almost always have a simple prosaic explanation. Another such oddity was seen in an image taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), which has attracted some attention. Most likely it is a natural rock formation, but it’s also not, as described by the tabloid Daily Mail, a “spherule” either.
The image shows a bright object casting a long shadow across the Floor of what might be a dried-up lakebed. Some observers have said it might be a Tower (or "Spire"), judging by the long shadow, but the view is from directly above and not enough detail can be seen on the object itself. The object does stand out for its brightness, but little more can be said about it. Using Occam’s Razor, it is most likely a natural geological rock formation, and not an alien tower, but it also can’t be a round “spherule” as referred to. The spherules seen by the Opportunity and Curiosity rovers are tiny, only a few millimeters across, way, way too small to be seen from orbit. If at all sphere-shaped, it is much bigger than that. Simply being round or tall also wouldn’t prove it was something artificial.MareKromium06/30/23 at 12:48Paolo C. Fienga: Esattissimo!
|
|
H-Elon_Musk.jpgBeware of Mr Elon...244 visiteQuando iniziò a "guardare al Cielo" e la Sua "Space-X" apparve, nel 2002, su una Rivista Americana che leggevo con grande interesse (Popular Mechanics), intuii che quel "Ragazzo" avrebbe fatto grandi cose.
Aveva una "Visione", un entusiasmo accattivante, un indubitabile "Senso del Cosmo" e, cosa che non guasta, risorse finanziarie quasi illimitate. Poteva fallire, poteva buttar via miliardi di USD, poteva far fiasco ed invece, con mia grande gioia, ce l'ha fatta (o, almeno, così sembra). Sarà stata la fama, esplosa quasi all'improvviso; saranno stati i complimenti, figli del successo, sarà che nella Vita si cambia: chi può saperlo? Ma il fatto era e rimane uno: quel "Ragazzo" che aveva una Visione non lo trovo più. Mi sembra, addirittura, che non sia mai esistito.
Ora è rimasto solo un "Divoratore", un uomo che si nutre del suo successo e che inizia a dar segni "strani".
C'è chi, in lui, vede un narcisista maligno, chi un "Paperone dello Spazio", chi uno che pensa di essere diventato una sorta di Dio. Io, non so esattamente che cosa pensare, ma una cosa è certa: continuo a seguirlo, con interesse, ma non lo riconosco più. Sembra fuori controllo. Leggo le sue esternazioni, mi documento sulle sue idee ed intuizioni, ma vedo sempre più megalomania e sempre meno "Visione". Sarà (anche) lui a riportarci sulla Luna ed oltre? Non so. Ma, onestamente parlando (scrivendo), oggi come oggi, spero proprio di no. Non incarna lo Spirito degli Apollo Days (proprio per nulla) e mi sembra impegnato solo a cercare di far parlare di sé e di quello che farà e comprerà.
Oggi, io ho paura di gente come lui: spero di sbagliare, ma temo che sia ormai una scheggia impazzita o un bambino ricchissimo che vuol giocare a fare la Storia a spese di chi la Storia la dovrà raccontare. Detto ciò, good luck Mr Elon! MareKromium06/30/23 at 12:45Paolo C. Fienga: Si Anakin: ignorance is bliss, diceva la mia compi...
|
|
Italy.jpgTake a close look...103 visiteSuggestiva. Bisognerebbe farla vedere a qualche "Esperto" dell'Aeronautica Militare ed a tutti i sostenitori delle teorie più assurde e strampalate sul perché il Nord-Italia sia in siccità conclamata da almeno 15 anni. E la situazione non va a migliorare, anzi... Ipotesi?!?MareKromium06/30/23 at 12:44Paolo C. Fienga: Carissimo Walt, un bolide di 80/100 metri che impa...
|
|
Italy.jpgTake a close look...103 visiteSuggestiva. Bisognerebbe farla vedere a qualche "Esperto" dell'Aeronautica Militare ed a tutti i sostenitori delle teorie più assurde e strampalate sul perché il Nord-Italia sia in siccità conclamata da almeno 15 anni. E la situazione non va a migliorare, anzi... Ipotesi?!?MareKromium06/06/23 at 06:58walthari: Paolo un bolide di quelle dimensioni non sarebbe d...
|
|
The_Tower-1.jpgA new "Monolith-like Structure" on Mars...119 visiteWith thousands of images taken by various probes sent to Mars, it would seem inevitable that unusual or puzzling objects might be seen in some of them. And of course, there have been, most notably the famous “Face on Mars” first seen in low-resolution Viking Orbiter images in the 1970s. Higher-resolution images taken later by other orbiters with better cameras showed it, and nearby interesting formations, to be just natural hills and mesas. Despite that, other curious things are seen in both orbital and ground images from time to time, although they almost always have a simple prosaic explanation. Another such oddity was seen in an image taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), which has attracted some attention. Most likely it is a natural rock formation, but it’s also not, as described by the tabloid Daily Mail, a “spherule” either.
The image shows a bright object casting a long shadow across the Floor of what might be a dried-up lakebed. Some observers have said it might be a Tower (or "Spire"), judging by the long shadow, but the view is from directly above and not enough detail can be seen on the object itself. The object does stand out for its brightness, but little more can be said about it. Using Occam’s Razor, it is most likely a natural geological rock formation, and not an alien tower, but it also can’t be a round “spherule” as referred to. The spherules seen by the Opportunity and Curiosity rovers are tiny, only a few millimeters across, way, way too small to be seen from orbit. If at all sphere-shaped, it is much bigger than that. Simply being round or tall also wouldn’t prove it was something artificial.MareKromium06/06/23 at 06:54walthari: i Campi Flegrei hanno un potenziale di distruzione...
|
|
The_Tower-1.jpgA new "Monolith-like Structure" on Mars...119 visiteWith thousands of images taken by various probes sent to Mars, it would seem inevitable that unusual or puzzling objects might be seen in some of them. And of course, there have been, most notably the famous “Face on Mars” first seen in low-resolution Viking Orbiter images in the 1970s. Higher-resolution images taken later by other orbiters with better cameras showed it, and nearby interesting formations, to be just natural hills and mesas. Despite that, other curious things are seen in both orbital and ground images from time to time, although they almost always have a simple prosaic explanation. Another such oddity was seen in an image taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), which has attracted some attention. Most likely it is a natural rock formation, but it’s also not, as described by the tabloid Daily Mail, a “spherule” either.
The image shows a bright object casting a long shadow across the Floor of what might be a dried-up lakebed. Some observers have said it might be a Tower (or "Spire"), judging by the long shadow, but the view is from directly above and not enough detail can be seen on the object itself. The object does stand out for its brightness, but little more can be said about it. Using Occam’s Razor, it is most likely a natural geological rock formation, and not an alien tower, but it also can’t be a round “spherule” as referred to. The spherules seen by the Opportunity and Curiosity rovers are tiny, only a few millimeters across, way, way too small to be seen from orbit. If at all sphere-shaped, it is much bigger than that. Simply being round or tall also wouldn’t prove it was something artificial.MareKromium04/08/23 at 16:44MareKromium: Il giorno in cui i Campi Flegrei (un Super-vulcano...
|
|
The_Tower-1.jpgA new "Monolith-like Structure" on Mars...119 visiteWith thousands of images taken by various probes sent to Mars, it would seem inevitable that unusual or puzzling objects might be seen in some of them. And of course, there have been, most notably the famous “Face on Mars” first seen in low-resolution Viking Orbiter images in the 1970s. Higher-resolution images taken later by other orbiters with better cameras showed it, and nearby interesting formations, to be just natural hills and mesas. Despite that, other curious things are seen in both orbital and ground images from time to time, although they almost always have a simple prosaic explanation. Another such oddity was seen in an image taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), which has attracted some attention. Most likely it is a natural rock formation, but it’s also not, as described by the tabloid Daily Mail, a “spherule” either.
The image shows a bright object casting a long shadow across the Floor of what might be a dried-up lakebed. Some observers have said it might be a Tower (or "Spire"), judging by the long shadow, but the view is from directly above and not enough detail can be seen on the object itself. The object does stand out for its brightness, but little more can be said about it. Using Occam’s Razor, it is most likely a natural geological rock formation, and not an alien tower, but it also can’t be a round “spherule” as referred to. The spherules seen by the Opportunity and Curiosity rovers are tiny, only a few millimeters across, way, way too small to be seen from orbit. If at all sphere-shaped, it is much bigger than that. Simply being round or tall also wouldn’t prove it was something artificial.MareKromium04/07/23 at 19:52walthari: in effetti i movimenti dei Flegrei sono sia in un ...
|
|
Italy.jpgTake a close look...103 visiteSuggestiva. Bisognerebbe farla vedere a qualche "Esperto" dell'Aeronautica Militare ed a tutti i sostenitori delle teorie più assurde e strampalate sul perché il Nord-Italia sia in siccità conclamata da almeno 15 anni. E la situazione non va a migliorare, anzi... Ipotesi?!?MareKromium03/24/23 at 06:00Paolo C. Fienga: Su Scala Planetaria (Terra, Marte, Giove etc. non ...
|
|
Italy.jpgTake a close look...103 visiteSuggestiva. Bisognerebbe farla vedere a qualche "Esperto" dell'Aeronautica Militare ed a tutti i sostenitori delle teorie più assurde e strampalate sul perché il Nord-Italia sia in siccità conclamata da almeno 15 anni. E la situazione non va a migliorare, anzi... Ipotesi?!?MareKromium03/21/23 at 10:49Anakin: Su scala planetaria o terrestre? Nel senso che spo...
|
|
Italy.jpgTake a close look...103 visiteSuggestiva. Bisognerebbe farla vedere a qualche "Esperto" dell'Aeronautica Militare ed a tutti i sostenitori delle teorie più assurde e strampalate sul perché il Nord-Italia sia in siccità conclamata da almeno 15 anni. E la situazione non va a migliorare, anzi... Ipotesi?!?MareKromium03/17/23 at 16:18Paolo C. Fienga: Vero, ed io vivo ancora a ridosso delle montagne. ...
|
|
The_Tower-1.jpgA new "Monolith-like Structure" on Mars...119 visiteWith thousands of images taken by various probes sent to Mars, it would seem inevitable that unusual or puzzling objects might be seen in some of them. And of course, there have been, most notably the famous “Face on Mars” first seen in low-resolution Viking Orbiter images in the 1970s. Higher-resolution images taken later by other orbiters with better cameras showed it, and nearby interesting formations, to be just natural hills and mesas. Despite that, other curious things are seen in both orbital and ground images from time to time, although they almost always have a simple prosaic explanation. Another such oddity was seen in an image taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), which has attracted some attention. Most likely it is a natural rock formation, but it’s also not, as described by the tabloid Daily Mail, a “spherule” either.
The image shows a bright object casting a long shadow across the Floor of what might be a dried-up lakebed. Some observers have said it might be a Tower (or "Spire"), judging by the long shadow, but the view is from directly above and not enough detail can be seen on the object itself. The object does stand out for its brightness, but little more can be said about it. Using Occam’s Razor, it is most likely a natural geological rock formation, and not an alien tower, but it also can’t be a round “spherule” as referred to. The spherules seen by the Opportunity and Curiosity rovers are tiny, only a few millimeters across, way, way too small to be seen from orbit. If at all sphere-shaped, it is much bigger than that. Simply being round or tall also wouldn’t prove it was something artificial.MareKromium03/17/23 at 16:06Paolo C. Fienga: Bella Anakin! Sei un Grande e mi fai sempre un gra...
|
|
| 379 immagini su 32 pagina(e) |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
