| Ultimi commenti - THE LUNAR EXPLORER ARCHIVES |
Italy.jpgTake a close look...118 visiteSuggestiva. Bisognerebbe farla vedere a qualche "Esperto" dell'Aeronautica Militare ed a tutti i sostenitori delle teorie più assurde e strampalate sul perché il Nord-Italia sia in siccità conclamata da almeno 15 anni. E la situazione non va a migliorare, anzi... Ipotesi?!?MareKromium03/24/23 at 06:00Paolo C. Fienga: Su Scala Planetaria (Terra, Marte, Giove etc. non ...
|
|
Italy.jpgTake a close look...118 visiteSuggestiva. Bisognerebbe farla vedere a qualche "Esperto" dell'Aeronautica Militare ed a tutti i sostenitori delle teorie più assurde e strampalate sul perché il Nord-Italia sia in siccità conclamata da almeno 15 anni. E la situazione non va a migliorare, anzi... Ipotesi?!?MareKromium03/21/23 at 10:49Anakin: Su scala planetaria o terrestre? Nel senso che spo...
|
|
Italy.jpgTake a close look...118 visiteSuggestiva. Bisognerebbe farla vedere a qualche "Esperto" dell'Aeronautica Militare ed a tutti i sostenitori delle teorie più assurde e strampalate sul perché il Nord-Italia sia in siccità conclamata da almeno 15 anni. E la situazione non va a migliorare, anzi... Ipotesi?!?MareKromium03/17/23 at 16:18Paolo C. Fienga: Vero, ed io vivo ancora a ridosso delle montagne. ...
|
|
The_Tower-1.jpgA new "Monolith-like Structure" on Mars...135 visiteWith thousands of images taken by various probes sent to Mars, it would seem inevitable that unusual or puzzling objects might be seen in some of them. And of course, there have been, most notably the famous “Face on Mars” first seen in low-resolution Viking Orbiter images in the 1970s. Higher-resolution images taken later by other orbiters with better cameras showed it, and nearby interesting formations, to be just natural hills and mesas. Despite that, other curious things are seen in both orbital and ground images from time to time, although they almost always have a simple prosaic explanation. Another such oddity was seen in an image taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), which has attracted some attention. Most likely it is a natural rock formation, but it’s also not, as described by the tabloid Daily Mail, a “spherule” either.
The image shows a bright object casting a long shadow across the Floor of what might be a dried-up lakebed. Some observers have said it might be a Tower (or "Spire"), judging by the long shadow, but the view is from directly above and not enough detail can be seen on the object itself. The object does stand out for its brightness, but little more can be said about it. Using Occam’s Razor, it is most likely a natural geological rock formation, and not an alien tower, but it also can’t be a round “spherule” as referred to. The spherules seen by the Opportunity and Curiosity rovers are tiny, only a few millimeters across, way, way too small to be seen from orbit. If at all sphere-shaped, it is much bigger than that. Simply being round or tall also wouldn’t prove it was something artificial.MareKromium03/17/23 at 16:06Paolo C. Fienga: Bella Anakin! Sei un Grande e mi fai sempre un gra...
|
|
The_Tower-1.jpgA new "Monolith-like Structure" on Mars...135 visiteWith thousands of images taken by various probes sent to Mars, it would seem inevitable that unusual or puzzling objects might be seen in some of them. And of course, there have been, most notably the famous “Face on Mars” first seen in low-resolution Viking Orbiter images in the 1970s. Higher-resolution images taken later by other orbiters with better cameras showed it, and nearby interesting formations, to be just natural hills and mesas. Despite that, other curious things are seen in both orbital and ground images from time to time, although they almost always have a simple prosaic explanation. Another such oddity was seen in an image taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), which has attracted some attention. Most likely it is a natural rock formation, but it’s also not, as described by the tabloid Daily Mail, a “spherule” either.
The image shows a bright object casting a long shadow across the Floor of what might be a dried-up lakebed. Some observers have said it might be a Tower (or "Spire"), judging by the long shadow, but the view is from directly above and not enough detail can be seen on the object itself. The object does stand out for its brightness, but little more can be said about it. Using Occam’s Razor, it is most likely a natural geological rock formation, and not an alien tower, but it also can’t be a round “spherule” as referred to. The spherules seen by the Opportunity and Curiosity rovers are tiny, only a few millimeters across, way, way too small to be seen from orbit. If at all sphere-shaped, it is much bigger than that. Simply being round or tall also wouldn’t prove it was something artificial.MareKromium03/14/23 at 16:01Anakin: ma figurati! Non hai nessun motivo di cui scusarti...
|
|
Italy.jpgTake a close look...118 visiteSuggestiva. Bisognerebbe farla vedere a qualche "Esperto" dell'Aeronautica Militare ed a tutti i sostenitori delle teorie più assurde e strampalate sul perché il Nord-Italia sia in siccità conclamata da almeno 15 anni. E la situazione non va a migliorare, anzi... Ipotesi?!?MareKromium03/14/23 at 09:55Anakin: Anche a Padova ? da diversi anni in cui neve o cer...
|
|
Italy.jpgTake a close look...118 visiteSuggestiva. Bisognerebbe farla vedere a qualche "Esperto" dell'Aeronautica Militare ed a tutti i sostenitori delle teorie più assurde e strampalate sul perché il Nord-Italia sia in siccità conclamata da almeno 15 anni. E la situazione non va a migliorare, anzi... Ipotesi?!?MareKromium03/13/23 at 10:47Ufologo: Cioé ......
|
|
Italy.jpgTake a close look...118 visiteSuggestiva. Bisognerebbe farla vedere a qualche "Esperto" dell'Aeronautica Militare ed a tutti i sostenitori delle teorie più assurde e strampalate sul perché il Nord-Italia sia in siccità conclamata da almeno 15 anni. E la situazione non va a migliorare, anzi... Ipotesi?!?MareKromium03/12/23 at 20:33Paolo C. Fienga: Anche a Milano e dintorni. Non ? una coincidenza: ...
|
|
Italy.jpgTake a close look...118 visiteSuggestiva. Bisognerebbe farla vedere a qualche "Esperto" dell'Aeronautica Militare ed a tutti i sostenitori delle teorie più assurde e strampalate sul perché il Nord-Italia sia in siccità conclamata da almeno 15 anni. E la situazione non va a migliorare, anzi... Ipotesi?!?MareKromium03/12/23 at 12:52Ufologo: Qui, in Brescia, la neve è diventata ... un mito!
|
|
Italy.jpgTake a close look...118 visiteSuggestiva. Bisognerebbe farla vedere a qualche "Esperto" dell'Aeronautica Militare ed a tutti i sostenitori delle teorie più assurde e strampalate sul perché il Nord-Italia sia in siccità conclamata da almeno 15 anni. E la situazione non va a migliorare, anzi... Ipotesi?!?MareKromium03/12/23 at 10:48Paolo C. Fienga: E' come se le nubi cariche di pioggia "ev...
|
|
The_Tower-1.jpgA new "Monolith-like Structure" on Mars...135 visiteWith thousands of images taken by various probes sent to Mars, it would seem inevitable that unusual or puzzling objects might be seen in some of them. And of course, there have been, most notably the famous “Face on Mars” first seen in low-resolution Viking Orbiter images in the 1970s. Higher-resolution images taken later by other orbiters with better cameras showed it, and nearby interesting formations, to be just natural hills and mesas. Despite that, other curious things are seen in both orbital and ground images from time to time, although they almost always have a simple prosaic explanation. Another such oddity was seen in an image taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), which has attracted some attention. Most likely it is a natural rock formation, but it’s also not, as described by the tabloid Daily Mail, a “spherule” either.
The image shows a bright object casting a long shadow across the Floor of what might be a dried-up lakebed. Some observers have said it might be a Tower (or "Spire"), judging by the long shadow, but the view is from directly above and not enough detail can be seen on the object itself. The object does stand out for its brightness, but little more can be said about it. Using Occam’s Razor, it is most likely a natural geological rock formation, and not an alien tower, but it also can’t be a round “spherule” as referred to. The spherules seen by the Opportunity and Curiosity rovers are tiny, only a few millimeters across, way, way too small to be seen from orbit. If at all sphere-shaped, it is much bigger than that. Simply being round or tall also wouldn’t prove it was something artificial.MareKromium03/11/23 at 15:21Paolo C. Fienga: Hai ragione Anakin, ho scritto una scemenza. Non s...
|
|
The_Tower-1.jpgA new "Monolith-like Structure" on Mars...135 visiteWith thousands of images taken by various probes sent to Mars, it would seem inevitable that unusual or puzzling objects might be seen in some of them. And of course, there have been, most notably the famous “Face on Mars” first seen in low-resolution Viking Orbiter images in the 1970s. Higher-resolution images taken later by other orbiters with better cameras showed it, and nearby interesting formations, to be just natural hills and mesas. Despite that, other curious things are seen in both orbital and ground images from time to time, although they almost always have a simple prosaic explanation. Another such oddity was seen in an image taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), which has attracted some attention. Most likely it is a natural rock formation, but it’s also not, as described by the tabloid Daily Mail, a “spherule” either.
The image shows a bright object casting a long shadow across the Floor of what might be a dried-up lakebed. Some observers have said it might be a Tower (or "Spire"), judging by the long shadow, but the view is from directly above and not enough detail can be seen on the object itself. The object does stand out for its brightness, but little more can be said about it. Using Occam’s Razor, it is most likely a natural geological rock formation, and not an alien tower, but it also can’t be a round “spherule” as referred to. The spherules seen by the Opportunity and Curiosity rovers are tiny, only a few millimeters across, way, way too small to be seen from orbit. If at all sphere-shaped, it is much bigger than that. Simply being round or tall also wouldn’t prove it was something artificial.MareKromium03/08/23 at 09:43Anakin: Ho trovato un articolo con questo titolo:
Bradi...
|
|
| 4437 immagini su 370 pagina(e) |
 |
|
|
|
|
12 | |
|
|
|
|
