| |
| Ultimi commenti - Saturn: the "Ringed Beauty" and His Moons |
Janus-MF-EB-LXTT.jpgJanus (RAW Natural Colors; credits for the additional process. and color.: Elisabetta Bonora and Marco Faccin - Lunexit Team)150 visiteJanus - apparently, and according to our Readers, one of the most interesting Celestial Bodies that we have shown and talked about on our APOD in the past - is one of the so-called "Inner Natural Satellites" of the Giant Gas-Planet Saturn; it is also called and known, sometimes, as Saturn X, and it occupies (better yet: shares) the same orbit as the Saturnian Inner Minor moon Epimetheus. This (now we know NOT infrequent) circumstance, however caused, in the past, some confusion to many astronomers which, at the time of Janus' discovery - and according to their different observations - assumed that there should have been only one Celestial Body in the orbit where Janus was spotted.
For a long time, in fact, the Astronomical Community struggled to figure out what was going on, until they realized that what they were trying to solve, was (let us use this expression) an "impossible equation": in other words, they were trying to reconcile (so-called "reductio ad unum") different observations of different and distinct Objects, on the wrong assumption that what they all were looking at, was just a single Celestial Body.
The discovery of Janus is attributed to its first observer, such as the French Astronomer Audouin Dollfus, who spotted Janus on December 15, 1966. The newly discovered Object was given the temporary designation of "S/1966 S 2". Previously, though, another Astronomer (Jean Texereau) had also photographed the very same Celestial Body (to be exact, on October 29, 1966), but without realizing the discovery! On December 18 of the same year, then, Richard Walker made a similar observation which is now credited as the discovery of Epimetheus.
Twelve years later, in October 1978, Stephen M. Larson and John W. Fountain finally realized that the 1966 observations would have been better explained by assuming that they were relative NOT to one, BUT to two distinct Objects (as we said, Janus and Epimetheus), sharing very similar (or perhaps the same, as we know now) orbits. Finally, in the AD 1980, the NASA - Voyager 1 Spacecraft confirmed that this "controversial moon" was, in fact, a couple of co-orbital Celestial Bodies.
Afterwards, Janus was observed on other occasions and given different provisional designations. It was observed, for instance, by the NASA - Pioneer 11 Probe when it passed near Saturn on September 1st, 1979. Janus was also observed by Dan Pascu on February 19, 1980 (and then provisionally designed as "S/1980 S 1") and then by John W. Fountain (once again), Stephen M. Larson (again), Harold J. Reitsema and Bradford A. Smith on the 23rd (and, this time, the observed object was, always provisionally, recorded as "S/1980 S 2").
All these Scientists, in a way and in the end, should therefore share, to various degrees, the title of Discoverer of Janus, but this "fair dispute", so far (and as far as we know), has not been solved.
As far as the physical characteristics of Janus are concerned, we can say that this relatively small moon (whose dimensions are approx. 203 × 185 × 153 Km) is extensively cratered, and a few of these craters are more than 30 Km across. The Janian Surface, as we already wrote in the past, appears to be older than Prometheus' one, but younger than Pandora's. Furthermore, if you consideri its oval (or, if you prefer, its "non-spherical") shape, its (very) low Density and relatively high Albedo, it seems logic to conclude, for the time being, that Janus should just be a porous and icy "rubble pile" (such as the final result of a cloud of Cosmic Debris that have coalesced under the influence of gravity).
The so-called Rubble Piles-type Celestial Bodies have a low density because there are, we believe, large cavities between the various "chunks" - such as fragments - of rocky material that made them up; Rubble Piles may also form when an Asteroid or a moon (which may originally be monolithic - such as "one single piece of rock") is smashed by an impact, and the shattered pieces left over by the impact, in time, fall back together, primarily due to self-gravitation (---> mutual attraction). In other words: a Celestial Body like Janus is formed, in our opinion, by a mass of different materials that cohered over time (we repeat: something like a "cloud" of Cosmic Debris - rocks, boulders, dust etc. - which, in time, due to a mutual gravitational attraction, got together until they became one - yet extremely fragile - Celestial Body).
In the light of the above considerations and assumptions, we, as IPF, believe that Janus can reasonably be assimilated, for instance (and among others), to Asteroid 25143 Itokawa or 433 Eros.MareKromium04/24/12 at 11:15Anakin: s?, vorrebbero creare delle sonde particolari capa...
|
|
Janus-MF-EB-LXTT.jpgJanus (RAW Natural Colors; credits for the additional process. and color.: Elisabetta Bonora and Marco Faccin - Lunexit Team)150 visiteJanus - apparently, and according to our Readers, one of the most interesting Celestial Bodies that we have shown and talked about on our APOD in the past - is one of the so-called "Inner Natural Satellites" of the Giant Gas-Planet Saturn; it is also called and known, sometimes, as Saturn X, and it occupies (better yet: shares) the same orbit as the Saturnian Inner Minor moon Epimetheus. This (now we know NOT infrequent) circumstance, however caused, in the past, some confusion to many astronomers which, at the time of Janus' discovery - and according to their different observations - assumed that there should have been only one Celestial Body in the orbit where Janus was spotted.
For a long time, in fact, the Astronomical Community struggled to figure out what was going on, until they realized that what they were trying to solve, was (let us use this expression) an "impossible equation": in other words, they were trying to reconcile (so-called "reductio ad unum") different observations of different and distinct Objects, on the wrong assumption that what they all were looking at, was just a single Celestial Body.
The discovery of Janus is attributed to its first observer, such as the French Astronomer Audouin Dollfus, who spotted Janus on December 15, 1966. The newly discovered Object was given the temporary designation of "S/1966 S 2". Previously, though, another Astronomer (Jean Texereau) had also photographed the very same Celestial Body (to be exact, on October 29, 1966), but without realizing the discovery! On December 18 of the same year, then, Richard Walker made a similar observation which is now credited as the discovery of Epimetheus.
Twelve years later, in October 1978, Stephen M. Larson and John W. Fountain finally realized that the 1966 observations would have been better explained by assuming that they were relative NOT to one, BUT to two distinct Objects (as we said, Janus and Epimetheus), sharing very similar (or perhaps the same, as we know now) orbits. Finally, in the AD 1980, the NASA - Voyager 1 Spacecraft confirmed that this "controversial moon" was, in fact, a couple of co-orbital Celestial Bodies.
Afterwards, Janus was observed on other occasions and given different provisional designations. It was observed, for instance, by the NASA - Pioneer 11 Probe when it passed near Saturn on September 1st, 1979. Janus was also observed by Dan Pascu on February 19, 1980 (and then provisionally designed as "S/1980 S 1") and then by John W. Fountain (once again), Stephen M. Larson (again), Harold J. Reitsema and Bradford A. Smith on the 23rd (and, this time, the observed object was, always provisionally, recorded as "S/1980 S 2").
All these Scientists, in a way and in the end, should therefore share, to various degrees, the title of Discoverer of Janus, but this "fair dispute", so far (and as far as we know), has not been solved.
As far as the physical characteristics of Janus are concerned, we can say that this relatively small moon (whose dimensions are approx. 203 × 185 × 153 Km) is extensively cratered, and a few of these craters are more than 30 Km across. The Janian Surface, as we already wrote in the past, appears to be older than Prometheus' one, but younger than Pandora's. Furthermore, if you consideri its oval (or, if you prefer, its "non-spherical") shape, its (very) low Density and relatively high Albedo, it seems logic to conclude, for the time being, that Janus should just be a porous and icy "rubble pile" (such as the final result of a cloud of Cosmic Debris that have coalesced under the influence of gravity).
The so-called Rubble Piles-type Celestial Bodies have a low density because there are, we believe, large cavities between the various "chunks" - such as fragments - of rocky material that made them up; Rubble Piles may also form when an Asteroid or a moon (which may originally be monolithic - such as "one single piece of rock") is smashed by an impact, and the shattered pieces left over by the impact, in time, fall back together, primarily due to self-gravitation (---> mutual attraction). In other words: a Celestial Body like Janus is formed, in our opinion, by a mass of different materials that cohered over time (we repeat: something like a "cloud" of Cosmic Debris - rocks, boulders, dust etc. - which, in time, due to a mutual gravitational attraction, got together until they became one - yet extremely fragile - Celestial Body).
In the light of the above considerations and assumptions, we, as IPF, believe that Janus can reasonably be assimilated, for instance (and among others), to Asteroid 25143 Itokawa or 433 Eros.MareKromium04/24/12 at 09:42paolocf1963: Non riesco a connettermi, ma non appena ho letto &...
|
|
Janus-MF-EB-LXTT.jpgJanus (RAW Natural Colors; credits for the additional process. and color.: Elisabetta Bonora and Marco Faccin - Lunexit Team)150 visiteJanus - apparently, and according to our Readers, one of the most interesting Celestial Bodies that we have shown and talked about on our APOD in the past - is one of the so-called "Inner Natural Satellites" of the Giant Gas-Planet Saturn; it is also called and known, sometimes, as Saturn X, and it occupies (better yet: shares) the same orbit as the Saturnian Inner Minor moon Epimetheus. This (now we know NOT infrequent) circumstance, however caused, in the past, some confusion to many astronomers which, at the time of Janus' discovery - and according to their different observations - assumed that there should have been only one Celestial Body in the orbit where Janus was spotted.
For a long time, in fact, the Astronomical Community struggled to figure out what was going on, until they realized that what they were trying to solve, was (let us use this expression) an "impossible equation": in other words, they were trying to reconcile (so-called "reductio ad unum") different observations of different and distinct Objects, on the wrong assumption that what they all were looking at, was just a single Celestial Body.
The discovery of Janus is attributed to its first observer, such as the French Astronomer Audouin Dollfus, who spotted Janus on December 15, 1966. The newly discovered Object was given the temporary designation of "S/1966 S 2". Previously, though, another Astronomer (Jean Texereau) had also photographed the very same Celestial Body (to be exact, on October 29, 1966), but without realizing the discovery! On December 18 of the same year, then, Richard Walker made a similar observation which is now credited as the discovery of Epimetheus.
Twelve years later, in October 1978, Stephen M. Larson and John W. Fountain finally realized that the 1966 observations would have been better explained by assuming that they were relative NOT to one, BUT to two distinct Objects (as we said, Janus and Epimetheus), sharing very similar (or perhaps the same, as we know now) orbits. Finally, in the AD 1980, the NASA - Voyager 1 Spacecraft confirmed that this "controversial moon" was, in fact, a couple of co-orbital Celestial Bodies.
Afterwards, Janus was observed on other occasions and given different provisional designations. It was observed, for instance, by the NASA - Pioneer 11 Probe when it passed near Saturn on September 1st, 1979. Janus was also observed by Dan Pascu on February 19, 1980 (and then provisionally designed as "S/1980 S 1") and then by John W. Fountain (once again), Stephen M. Larson (again), Harold J. Reitsema and Bradford A. Smith on the 23rd (and, this time, the observed object was, always provisionally, recorded as "S/1980 S 2").
All these Scientists, in a way and in the end, should therefore share, to various degrees, the title of Discoverer of Janus, but this "fair dispute", so far (and as far as we know), has not been solved.
As far as the physical characteristics of Janus are concerned, we can say that this relatively small moon (whose dimensions are approx. 203 × 185 × 153 Km) is extensively cratered, and a few of these craters are more than 30 Km across. The Janian Surface, as we already wrote in the past, appears to be older than Prometheus' one, but younger than Pandora's. Furthermore, if you consideri its oval (or, if you prefer, its "non-spherical") shape, its (very) low Density and relatively high Albedo, it seems logic to conclude, for the time being, that Janus should just be a porous and icy "rubble pile" (such as the final result of a cloud of Cosmic Debris that have coalesced under the influence of gravity).
The so-called Rubble Piles-type Celestial Bodies have a low density because there are, we believe, large cavities between the various "chunks" - such as fragments - of rocky material that made them up; Rubble Piles may also form when an Asteroid or a moon (which may originally be monolithic - such as "one single piece of rock") is smashed by an impact, and the shattered pieces left over by the impact, in time, fall back together, primarily due to self-gravitation (---> mutual attraction). In other words: a Celestial Body like Janus is formed, in our opinion, by a mass of different materials that cohered over time (we repeat: something like a "cloud" of Cosmic Debris - rocks, boulders, dust etc. - which, in time, due to a mutual gravitational attraction, got together until they became one - yet extremely fragile - Celestial Body).
In the light of the above considerations and assumptions, we, as IPF, believe that Janus can reasonably be assimilated, for instance (and among others), to Asteroid 25143 Itokawa or 433 Eros.MareKromium04/24/12 at 08:35Anakin: mah!...
http : / / www . space . com /15395 - a...
|
|
Saturn_and_Friends-EB-MF-LXTT.jpgSaturn and some "Friends" (Natural Colors; credits for the additional process. and color.: Elisabetta Bonora and Marco Faccin - Lunexit Team)164 visitenessun commentoMareKromium04/24/12 at 08:22Anakin: Fantastic!!!
|
|
Prometheus & Pandora form Voyager 1.jpgPrometheus & Pandora from Voyager 159 visiteUn'immagine "datata", ma la prima - in assoluto! - che riuscì a mostrarci i primi due (e forse i più famosi) Ring-Master di Saturno: Pandora e Prometeo.
Simili, per i compiti da essi svolti, ai cani che i pastori impiegano per impedire alle pecore raccolte in gregge di disperdersi (ed anche per tale motivo chiamati "Shepherd Moons"), essi "vegliano" sui detriti che formano il più sottile ed irregolare degli Anelli di Saturno ( l'Anello "F") e lo mantengono "in situ"!
Da non dimenticare, tuttavia, che Prometeo - anche a seguito di alcune immagini ottenute da Cassini (una delle quali Vi proponiamo più avanti - PIA06143), sembra essere "collegato" all'Anello "F" da un "cordone di polveri e detriti" e qualche Scienziato ha anche ipotizzato che questo Ring-Master non solo concorre a mantenere l'Anello "F" stabile, ma anche - ed in qualche modo - lo "priva" di parte del materiale che lo forma.04/02/12 at 14:21Anakin: Fantastica!
|
|
Tethys-PIA14581-PCF-LXTT-0.jpgTethys (False b/w - credits for the additional process.: Dr Paolo C. Fienga - Lunexit Team)198 visiteCaption NASA:"Saturn's moon Tethys shows off its tortured Surface in this Cassini Spacecraft image. On the top left of the image there is huge Odysseus Crater. On the bottom right, instead, there is Ithaca Chasma: a series of Scarps that run North-to-South across the moon for more than 620 miles (approx. 1000 Km). North on Tethys is up and rotated 25° to the right. This view looks toward the area between the Leading Hemisphere and Saturn-facing side of Tethys.
The image was taken in Visible Green Light with the Cassini Spacecraft narrow-angle camera on Sept. 14, 2011. The view was acquired at a distance of approximately 178.000 miles (approx. 287.000 Km) from Tethys and at a Sun-Tethys-Spacecraft, or Phase, Angle of 11°. Image scale is about 1 mile (1,6 Km) per pixel". MareKromium12/17/11 at 07:21titanio44: molto penosa :O) buon weekend
|
|
Tethys-PIA14581-PCF-LXTT-0.jpgTethys (False b/w - credits for the additional process.: Dr Paolo C. Fienga - Lunexit Team)198 visiteCaption NASA:"Saturn's moon Tethys shows off its tortured Surface in this Cassini Spacecraft image. On the top left of the image there is huge Odysseus Crater. On the bottom right, instead, there is Ithaca Chasma: a series of Scarps that run North-to-South across the moon for more than 620 miles (approx. 1000 Km). North on Tethys is up and rotated 25° to the right. This view looks toward the area between the Leading Hemisphere and Saturn-facing side of Tethys.
The image was taken in Visible Green Light with the Cassini Spacecraft narrow-angle camera on Sept. 14, 2011. The view was acquired at a distance of approximately 178.000 miles (approx. 287.000 Km) from Tethys and at a Sun-Tethys-Spacecraft, or Phase, Angle of 11°. Image scale is about 1 mile (1,6 Km) per pixel". MareKromium11/15/11 at 15:40MareKromium: Il "Falso black and white" ? una mia inv...
|
|
Rhea-N00084610.jpgOver-exposed Rhea65 visitenessun commentoMareKromium07/03/11 at 20:00MareKromium: Image-artifact? YESSSSS!
|
|
Janus-N00141745to56.gifIn the shadow of Saturn... (GIF-Movie; credits: Dr M. Faccin)57 visitenessun commentoMareKromium06/29/11 at 14:03MareKromium: Spettacolare! Poco visto e poco compreso. Peccato....
|
|
Streak-N00065622-3.jpgWhat is that? (detail mgnf n. 2)75 visiteAl "cambio di direzione" n. 2 - il più netto - si intravede una leggera "nebbia", come se l'oggetto stesse perdendo materiale. Questo comportamento è coerente con l'ipotesi del "bolide", ma l'ipotesi di un bolide che si "incendi" nel vuoto è, in sè, insostenibile.
Purtroppo.05/29/11 at 14:12MareKromium: ...Dopo aver letto il "commentino" di St...
|
|
Saturn-PIA09185.jpgThe Saturnian "Hexagon" and Aurora59 visiteThis nighttime view of Saturn's north pole by the visual and infrared mapping spectrometer on NASA's Cassini orbiter reveals a dynamic, active planet at least 75 kilometers (47 miles) below the normal cloud tops seen in visible light. Clearly revealed is the bizarre six-sided hexagon feature present at the north pole.
This image is one of the first clear images of the north polar region ever acquired from a unique polar perspective. In this image, the blue color shows high-altitude emissions from atmospheric molecules excited by charged particles smashing into the atmosphere along Saturn's powerful magnetic field lines, producing the aurora at very high altitudes in Saturn's atmosphere. The red color indicates the amount of 5-micron wavelength radiation, or heat, generated in the depths of the warm interior of Saturn that escapes the planet. Clouds blocking this light are revealed as silhouettes against the background thermal glow of the planet.
This image is among the first to capture the entire hexagonal feature and north polar region in one shot. It is also one of the first polar views using Saturn's thermal glow at 5 microns (seven times the wavelength visible to the human eye) as the light source. This allows polar cloud features to be revealed during the persistent nighttime conditions under way during north polar winter.
The hexagonal feature was originally discovered by NASA's Voyager spacecraft in 1980, but those images and subsequent ground-based telescope images suffered from poor viewing perspectives, which placed the feature and the north pole at the extreme northern limb (edge) in those images.
The strong brightness of the hexagon feature indicates that it is primarily a clearing in the clouds, which extends deep into the atmosphere, at least down to the 3-bar (3-Earth atmospheres pressure) level, about 75 kilometers (47 miles) below the clouds and hazes seen in visible wavelengths. Thick clouds border both sides of the narrow feature, as indicated by the adjacent dark lanes paralleling the bright hexagon. This image and other images acquired over a 12-day period between Oct. 30 and Nov. 11, 2006, show that the feature is nearly stationary, and likely is an unusually strong pole-encircling planetary wave that extends deep into the atmosphere.
This image was acquired by the Cassini visual and infrared mapping spectrometer on Oct. 29, 2006, from an average distance of 905,000 kilometers (562,340 miles) above the clouds.
04/22/11 at 15:02MareKromium: Devo dire che CICAS ha centrato il punto della que...
|
|
Saturn-PIA09185.jpgThe Saturnian "Hexagon" and Aurora59 visiteThis nighttime view of Saturn's north pole by the visual and infrared mapping spectrometer on NASA's Cassini orbiter reveals a dynamic, active planet at least 75 kilometers (47 miles) below the normal cloud tops seen in visible light. Clearly revealed is the bizarre six-sided hexagon feature present at the north pole.
This image is one of the first clear images of the north polar region ever acquired from a unique polar perspective. In this image, the blue color shows high-altitude emissions from atmospheric molecules excited by charged particles smashing into the atmosphere along Saturn's powerful magnetic field lines, producing the aurora at very high altitudes in Saturn's atmosphere. The red color indicates the amount of 5-micron wavelength radiation, or heat, generated in the depths of the warm interior of Saturn that escapes the planet. Clouds blocking this light are revealed as silhouettes against the background thermal glow of the planet.
This image is among the first to capture the entire hexagonal feature and north polar region in one shot. It is also one of the first polar views using Saturn's thermal glow at 5 microns (seven times the wavelength visible to the human eye) as the light source. This allows polar cloud features to be revealed during the persistent nighttime conditions under way during north polar winter.
The hexagonal feature was originally discovered by NASA's Voyager spacecraft in 1980, but those images and subsequent ground-based telescope images suffered from poor viewing perspectives, which placed the feature and the north pole at the extreme northern limb (edge) in those images.
The strong brightness of the hexagon feature indicates that it is primarily a clearing in the clouds, which extends deep into the atmosphere, at least down to the 3-bar (3-Earth atmospheres pressure) level, about 75 kilometers (47 miles) below the clouds and hazes seen in visible wavelengths. Thick clouds border both sides of the narrow feature, as indicated by the adjacent dark lanes paralleling the bright hexagon. This image and other images acquired over a 12-day period between Oct. 30 and Nov. 11, 2006, show that the feature is nearly stationary, and likely is an unusually strong pole-encircling planetary wave that extends deep into the atmosphere.
This image was acquired by the Cassini visual and infrared mapping spectrometer on Oct. 29, 2006, from an average distance of 905,000 kilometers (562,340 miles) above the clouds.
04/22/11 at 14:44cicas65: Ma il punto ? proprio questo, Walthari, e cio? che...
|
|
| 920 immagini su 77 pagina(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
37 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
